
The enrolment deadline for the newly regulated sectors was 29 July 2026. Three weeks later, on 20 August, AUSTRAC's figures showed 17,970 real estate agencies enrolled out of roughly 45,000 offices nationwide, as reported by Real Estate Business on 27 August. In the same week, AUSTRAC began issuing section 167 notices to businesses that appear to be providing designated services but have not enrolled.
Those two facts sit together, and I think they are being read the wrong way round. The notices are getting the attention. The number is the more useful signal.
What the number does and does not tell you
Be careful with the arithmetic. The 45,000 is a count of offices; enrolment is by reporting entity, and one entity can operate several offices. Some of the gap is franchise groups and multi-office agencies enrolling once. Some of it is offices that do not provide a designated service at all, such as pure property management with no sales function. AUSTRAC has not published a consolidated tally across all newly regulated sectors, and I would treat any single figure for the whole Tranche 2 population with the same caution. The best public estimate of the total population remains the roughly 80,000 entities AUSTRAC expected to come into scope.
Even with those adjustments, a large part of the sector had not enrolled a month after the deadline. That is not a scandal. Most of those principals are not hiding from anyone. They run small businesses, the obligation is new, and enrolment competed with settlements, listings and staff. But it does mean a great many agencies are starting from zero, and a good number of the ones that have enrolled have done exactly that and nothing more.
What a section 167 notice actually is
A section 167 notice is an information-gathering tool under the AML/CTF Act. It is not a penalty and it is not a finding. AUSTRAC uses it to require a business to produce information and documents so the regulator can work out what the business does and whether it is captured. The reporting on the first real estate notices describes requests for enrolment details, business structure, the services offered, payment methods, brokering and agency agreements, cash-handling policies, and transaction records for any cash or virtual asset dealings.
Two things matter about that list. First, it is not a request for a policy manual. It asks what the business does and for the records that show it. Second, failing to respond, or responding with false or misleading information, is where the real exposure sits; the provision carries both an offence and a civil penalty. Holding Redlich's note on the notices makes the same point: the notice is the moment the conversation moves from what you intended to do to what you can produce.
Read as a sequence, this looks like population mapping rather than punishment. AUSTRAC's CEO has said consistently that the regulatory focus would be businesses complicit in criminal exploitation or those that fail to meet the fundamental requirements. Enrolment is the most fundamental requirement there is, so the first notices going to unenrolled businesses is exactly what the regulator told everyone to expect.
Enrolment was step one
Here is the part I want agency principals to sit with. Enrolment registers you. It does not make you operational. On the day after enrolment, an agency still has to be able to do the following, and show that it did.
- Recognise when a designated service is being provided, and record that decision on the file
- Identify and verify the customer before the service starts, not at settlement
- Rate the risk of the customer and the matter, so the checks match the actual risk
- Escalate higher-risk matters for enhanced due diligence, with someone accountable for the decision
- Keep monitoring once the relationship is open
- Decide whether a suspicious matter needs reporting, and keep a record of the reasoning either way
- Give staff clear responsibilities and give someone oversight of whether they are being followed
- Produce organised evidence when a regulator, an auditor or a buyer of the business asks for it
None of that is exotic. It is the difference between an agency that can answer a section 167 notice in an afternoon and one that spends three weeks reconstructing what it did. The agencies that are enrolled and operational deserve credit, because they did the unglamorous work early. The concern is the larger group who enrolled, filed the confirmation email, and went back to selling houses.
Why we built a page around this
This week we published a campaign page for real estate agencies and buyers' agencies built on that exact message: enrolled is not the same as operational. It sets out the operational gap in plain terms, treats buyers' agencies as a distinct workflow rather than an afterthought, and points to two practical next steps.
The first is the free Tranche 2 scope check. It takes about two minutes, stores nothing, and gives an initial indication of whether the work in front of you is a designated service and who you would need to identify. If you already have an AML provider, it is a useful independent sense-check of whether your current arrangements cover the services you actually provide.
The second is a demonstration with Paul and me. Paul built the core of the True Comply platform around real estate operations, including the buyer's agent role, before Tranche 2 was law. My background is investigations and regulatory enforcement. Between us we can show how the eight items above become a workflow an office will actually follow, configured around the agency's existing processes rather than the other way round.
What to do this week
If you are enrolled, write down the date and check that the eight items above have an owner and a record. If you are not enrolled and you provide designated services, the steps are unchanged from July and are set out in what to do if you missed the enrolment deadline. If you are not sure whether you are captured, how scope actually works is the place to start, and write down what you conclude. A notice, if one arrives, is answered with records. Start making them now.
Sources: Real Estate Business, “AML crackdown begins: AUSTRAC puts real estate agencies under scrutiny”, 27 August 2026; Holding Redlich, “AUSTRAC's section 167 notices: the next challenge for Tranche 2 entities”, 31 August 2026; CPA Australia, “AUSTRAC opens enrolments but are Tranche 2 entities ready?”, 7 April 2026. Figures are as reported at those dates and have not been separately confirmed against an AUSTRAC release.
Related insights
- AUSTRAC hasn't changed its posture. It's changed phase.
Industry · 7 min read
- Tranche 2 is here: what it means for Australian real estate agencies
Real estate · 5 min read
- You missed the 29 July enrolment deadline. What now?
Getting compliant · 5 min read
Sector guide: AML/CTF compliance for real estate agencies